Cite as:
Corbera E, Brown K, 2010, "Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon" Environment and Planning A 42(7) 1739 – 1761
Download citation data in RIS format

Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon

Esteve Corbera, Katrina Brown

Received 27 October 2009; in revised form 3 March 2010

Abstract. Emissions trading has created new forms of exchangeable property which become commodities when traded in markets designed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and mitigate climate change. This paper analyzes a set of social processes which influence who benefits from reductions in emissions generated by primary production from forest ecosystems. Informed by commodification literature, and property and access theory, we suggest that farmers and rural communities cannot derive full benefits from carbon sequestration because they lack key structural and relational mechanisms, such as capital, knowledge, expertise, technology, and, in some cases, even labour. We illustrate this argument by examining three ongoing carbon-forestry projects in China, Ecuador, and Mexico and we highlight its implications for future forestry mitigation projects and programmes.

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 230 Kb

 References  81 references, 37 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 54.224.124.110) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).