Cite as:
Fearnley L, 2008, "Signals come and go: syndromic surveillance and styles of biosecurity" Environment and Planning A 40(7) 1615 – 1632
Download citation data in RIS format

Signals come and go: syndromic surveillance and styles of biosecurity

Lyle Fearnley

Received 16 March 2007; in revised form 28 November 2007

Abstract. This paper follows the development of a novel biosecurity technology known as ‘syndromic surveillance’. By monitoring new sources of nondiagnostic health information (911 calls, ER triage logs, pharmaceutical sales), syndromic surveillance produces new ‘territories of intelligibility’. But the implemention of syndromic systems—and the opening up of these new territories—poses a problem of interpretation. What is significant in nondiagnostic data flows? In fact, the development of a national syndromic system in the United States attracted criticism from local public health experts, who complained about the costs of ‘false positive’ or insignificant detections. This exposes a disjuncture between two interpretative frameworks, two styles of governing biosecurity: public health (a responsibility for maximal population health) and preparedness (a concern for disaster-scale events). At stake are new norms and forms of securing life.

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 179 Kb

 References  85 references, 15 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 38.107.191.109) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. Please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).