Ottaviano G I P, Thisse J-F, 2005, "New economic geography: what about the N?" Environment and Planning A 37(10) 1707 – 1725
Download citation data in RIS format
New economic geography: what about the N?
Gianmarco I P Ottaviano, Jacques-François Thisse
Received 29 January 2004; in revised form 25 August 2004
Abstract. Since its very appearance, probably thanks to its provocative name, new economic geography (NEG) has stirred a debate on whether it is economic geography proper or rather geographical economics. In both cases, its real novelty has been questioned. We focus on this last issue. In particular, we argue that many NEG ideas have been around for a long time in the works of economic geographers and location theorists. However, NEG has the fundamental merit of having framed those ideas within a general equilibrium model encompassing most of these ideas. This has drawn economic geography and location theory from the periphery to the center of mainstream economic theory. More importantly, it has made already existing ideas more amenable to empirical scrutiny and policy analysis.
Full-text PDF size: 198 Kb
References 75 references, 27 with DOI links ()
Your computer (IP address: 22.214.171.124) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).