2005 volume 37(8) pages 1443 – 1459
doi:10.1068/a37222

Cite as:
Johnston R, Propper C, Sarker R, Jones K, Bolster A, Burgess S, 2005, "Neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood effects" Environment and Planning A 37(8) 1443 – 1459

Download citation data in RIS format

Neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood effects

Ron Johnston, Carol Propper, Rebecca Sarker, Kelvyn Jones, Anne Bolster, Simon Burgess

Received 7 July 2004; in revised form 19 October 2004

Abstract. Recent research has provided very strong circumstantial evidence of the existence of neighbourhood effects in voting patterns at recent UK general elections. The usual reason adduced to account for these spatial variations is the neighbourhood effect. This hypothesises that people are influenced in their decisionmaking and behavioural patterns by their neighbours, with interpersonal conversation being the main means of transmitting such influence. Although there is an increasing body of evidence showing the impact of such conversations--that people who talk together, vote together--relatively little of this has grounded the geography of such conversations in the individuals’ local neighbourhoods. Those who interact locally should show more evidence of ‘neighbourhood-effect-like’ patterns than those who do not. To inquire whether this is indeed so, this paper extends recent work on voting patterns in the United Kingdom by investigating the behaviour of individuals with different levels of participation in their local milieux--what we define below as neighbourhood social capital.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 199 Kb

HTML References  30 references, 13 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 54.224.75.101) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).