2002 volume 34(7) pages 1185 – 1206
doi:10.1068/a34171

Cite as:
Hewko J, Smoyer-Tomic K E, Hodgson M J, 2002, "Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: does aggregation error matter?" Environment and Planning A 34(7) 1185 – 1206

Download citation data in RIS format

Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: does aggregation error matter?

Jared Hewko, Karen E Smoyer-Tomic, M John Hodgson

Received 20 August 2001; in revised form 7 February 2002

Abstract. Neighbourhood spatial accessibility (NSA) refers to the ease with which residents of a given neighbourhood can reach amenities. NSA indicators have been used to inform urban policy issues, such as amenity provision and spatial equity. NSA measures are, however, susceptible to numerous methodological problems. We investigate one methodological issue, aggregation error, as it relates to the measurement of NSA. Aggregation error arises when, for the purpose of distance calculations, a single point is used to represent a neighbourhood, which in turn represents an aggregation of spatially distributed individuals. NSA to three types of recreational amenities (playgrounds, community halls, and leisure centres) in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada is used to assess whether aggregation error affects NSA measures. The authors use exploratory spatial data analysis techniques, including local indicators of spatial association, to examine aggregation-error effects on NSA. By integrating finer resolution data into NSA measures, we demonstrate that aggregation error does affect NSA indicators, but that the effect depends on the type of amenity under investigation. Aggregation error is particularly problematic when measuring NSA to amenities that are abundant and have highly localized service areas, such as playgrounds. We recommend that, when analyzing NSA to these types of amenities, researchers integrate finer resolution data to indicate the spatial distribution of individuals within neighbourhoods better, and hence reduce aggregation error.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 1460 Kb

HTML References  35 references, 6 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 54.144.198.23) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).