2001 volume 33(5) pages 881 – 900
doi:10.1068/a33128

Cite as:
Harris R, Lehman M, 2001, "Social and geographic inequities in the residential property tax: a review and case study" Environment and Planning A 33(5) 881 – 900

Download citation data in RIS format

Social and geographic inequities in the residential property tax: a review and case study

Richard Harris, Michael Lehman

Received 27 July 2000; in revised form 2 February 2001

Abstract. Although the fact is not widely acknowledged by urban scholars, because of the way that it is administered the property tax helps to shape the social geography of metropolitan areas. Research by public finance specialists has shown that cheap housing is often overassessed, and that variations in assessment ratios (the ratio of assessed to market values) usually favour the suburbs. Sales prices and assessment data from the Hamilton, Ontario, metropolitan area for 1976, 1996, and 1999 confirm these patterns and show that they are persistent. In addition, cross-tabulations by market value and location show that geographical variations in assessment ratios are caused by the inequitable treatment of inexpensive property, not vice versa. A 1998 reassessment made the situation worse. The main difficulty in reducing tax inequities is political, not technical.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 395 Kb

HTML References  46 references, 7 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 54.226.148.122) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).