Cite as:
Blaikie P, 2000, "Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review" Environment and Planning A 32(6) 1033 – 1050
Download citation data in RIS format

Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review

Piers Blaikie

Received 2 April 1999; in revised form 9 September 1999

Abstract. The notion and practice of development have been severely critiqued from both modernist and postmodernist perspectives, yet the global development industry flourishes. The latter have afforded important insights, but also suffer from unexamined ideological agendas, a disinclination to undertake detailed research into development processes and policy, a preoccupation with texts and representations by the development industry, and from perpetuating an indulgent and agenda-less academic cul-de-sac. Instead, the postmodern critique of development could lead to a more politically astute and practical reconstruction of certain aspects of 'development', particularly in the neopopulist mode of developmentalism. Three powerful development paradigms are identified, and the ways in which they are constructed, promoted, and adapted are discussed in the light of conflicting modernist and postmodern accounts.

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 156 Kb

 References  99 references, 8 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 23.20.196.179) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).