Johnston R J, 1993, "Formulaic follies revisited: or, why geography researchers get almost twice as much money as do town planners in English universities" Environment and Planning A 25(10) 1527 – 1534
Download citation data in RIS format
Formulaic follies revisited: or, why geography researchers get almost twice as much money as do town planners in English universities
R J Johnston
Received 5 August 1993
Abstract. The funding for research activities in English universities from 1993/94 on is based on a formula allocation which has many apparent anomalies: variations in the standardised sums available per discipline bear little relationship to interdisciplinary differences in research costs. Using data released by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, I seek to understand how those differences have come about. Only 43% of the variation could be accounted for statistically by a simple classification of disciplines into clinical, science, and social science/humanities. A further 17% was associated with four other factors reflecting institutional differences in aspects of the disciplines which could have been taken into account when the allocation formula was determined -- but which were not. The conclusion is that a much fairer system can and must replace that currently operated.
Full-text PDF size: 903 Kb
Your computer (IP address: 126.96.36.199) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).